New World Order (NWO), Not new, Doesn't include whole world, There is nothing ordered about it

you thought big brother wasn't watching ;-)

The U.N. and it's offshoot committees, study groups, and panels are trying to find some cause which gives them relevance. Relevance means they can show leadership in crisis. They need that relevance if they are going to try and restructure the world's sovereignty away from individual countries and more under the "New World Order" control at the U.N.

Lately it seems that they are just manufacturing crisis' that they then try to lead the way to fix. Ice ages, global warming, species extinction from hot, species extinction from cold, fertility management, or eugenics has all turned out to be a bunch of nonsense looking for credibility. Not very impressive.

Problem0: Your scientists always confirm what the U.N. leadership wants them to confirm. The scientific analysis is backwards. You don't specify a conclusion, and then have your scientists manipulate the data to prove it. That's not science. Science is empirical observations that lead to undeniable conclusions. Grants, financing, and publishing revenues is not part of empirical science.

Problem1: They U.N. has no credibility. Most things the U.N. tries to do ends up in disaster. Votes at the U.N. on important topics is always stalemate, and most countries in the U.N. can't even agree on what day it is. U.N. is a collection of cliques that always vote for or against together regardless of the issue. No one ever changes their vote, so it's not even a flexible democracy that controls the U.N.

Problem2: Countries like the United States will never be subservient to the U.N.. America won't be controlled by unqualified and uninformed dictators, monarchs and global cliques.

Problem3: The U.N. is full of socialist dictators and pampered monarchs who violate human rights on a daily basis. Why would any nation want to be subservient to them? You need more democracies!

Problem4: If Europeans actually believe they are more qualified to run the world than other nations, then why do they think that? Let's look at some statistics from wars and anthropogenic disasters in the history of Europe and the world. 

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll

From where I am sitting Europe has killed and destroyed more lives than any other continent in the history of the world. Europe's track record of peace, tolerance, and fair treatment by European elites is atrocious. Why the hell would I trust them to govern me?

Problem5: Members of the U.N., the delegations, and country representatives are generally appointed based on nepotism and connections to the powers that be in each country. There are two concepts which are never discussed in the same sentence. They are "U.N. representative" and "work ethic". A controlling government needs an army of leaders and doers. Not an army of pampered sloth.