Al Gore, Tilting At The Global Warming Windmill, Equates His Struggle With Fight For Civil Rights

Does this look like global warming?

Poor Al Gore totally committed to climate change policies and wealth redistribution with no confirmed scientific justification. Any claims that the majority of scientists and science confirm global warming, are just made up. Numerous times scientists with their sciences have stood up and said "I disagree with Gore's climate change claims". For now lets forget "Climategate scandal" where data was manipulated, with threats to destroy collected raw data, and stories of "fudge" factors to make the simulation show temperature is rising.

I suggest that Al Gore's Struggle With Global Warming is really Al Gore's struggle with delusions of grandeur, and his narcissism. 



For those with scientific interest, the best science data I have found is: 1948-1978 temperatures were stable, no noticeable temperature rise and fall. This is unexpected since between 1948-1978 we saw the largest increase in cars, factories, and manufacturing around the world. Using their own global warming logic, temperatures should have rose. They didn't. From 1978-1998 temperatures increased a slight amount. This is consistent with the changes in data collection. A temperature monitor placed in the 1960s might be in a field of grass with tree shade with breezes. The same temperature monitor in the late seventies could be surrounded by asphalt with building exhausts just a few feet away, and there are no shade trees anymore. With those conditions of course the temperature monitor is going to collect higher temperatures, even if the "real" temperature hasn't changed. From 1998-2008, temperatures decreased. In other words slightly cooling. In these years there was actual cooling that has never been accepted by the "global warming fanatics". They have never acknowledged the harsher winters except to say that that it somehow proves global warmer is true. How can cooling prove global warming is true?

Al Gore's Nashville Home. Uses 20X energy of normal home

Global warming needs to be viewed as a profit generating scheme to redistribute wealth from the rich nations to the poor nations. A giant payola scheme where those in the right position will make billions from these wealth transfers. Anyone questioning the profit motive of the green movement? Al Gore was worth about 5 million, when he ran for president, before he profited from the green movement. A couple of years later Al Gore was worth 100 million just from his precisely calculated investment in green technologies. So if Al Gore says he's not in it to make money, he's a liar.

Al Gores new $9 million Dollar Ocean View Hacienda. Uses more energy than my house.

Roughly 50% of all scientists disagree with the findings of the UN's IPCC reports on global climate. In fact not only do they disagree but that are shocked by the UN's PR scare tactics.  For example: in 2005 a report was released that calculated that by the year 2010 world wide there would be 50 million refugees from areas where the worse warming conditions forced their migration to more fertile regions. So far not a single refugee from global warming has been determined and it is now 2011. So their calculations were off by 100% or 50 million people.

Now since Al Gore is so desperate, his reputation and credibility in shambles, he's trying to guilt people into supporting him. He wants the global warming struggle to be viewed as the civil rights struggle. That's an insult to those who fought for civil rights.

One issue. Has anyone noticed that in the last 5 years the winters have been colder, longer, with more snow, and snowing later in the winter season. Well it's all true but global warmers claim that that doesn't change the average temperatures for the fall and winter seasons. That shows you their problem right away. We see colder temperatures lasting longer and they say that it doesn't impact global warming data collection. It's impossible for it not to effect the average temperatures. Their use and collection of raw data is questionable to say the least.

Some other issues. Global warmers are constantly talking about their cutting edge scientific global condition simulator and how it makes exact predictions decades in the future. First, this simulator is nothing more than a Fortran (Formula Translation) number cruncher software program that place values into a formula and spits out a result. You can control what it spits out by what you put in. In another words Garbage In, Garbage Out. The formula translation can be manipulated by fudge factors to change the outcome. Second, it is common knowledge by all the weather services that any hope for an accurate prediction of weather is at best a few days in the future. Not decades, not centuries, a few days. So how can global warmers claim their simulation can predict decades ahead. They are lying. Nobody has the capability to predict the complex weather patterns decades in advance.

source: http://hotair.com/archives/2011/04/16/gore-global-warming-fight-a-lot-like-the-civil-rights-movement/

source1: http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/156445-al-gore-to-youth-battle-industry-lobbyists-to-turn-the-tide-on-climate